97 Ga. 253 | Ga. | 1895
1. Where objection was made to the introduction in evidence of a tax execution on the ground, as alleged, that the name thereto, purporting to be that of the tax-collec
2. The question ruled upon in the preceding note being the only one which can be determined by this court without reference to the so-called brief of evidence, and that document not having been prepared in conformity to law, but to a large extent consisting of questions and answers, and also containing reports of lengthy colloquies between court and counsel, and other unnecessary, irrelevant and superfluous matter, this court will not examine it for the purpose of determining whether or not errors were committed either by the court or the jury. Judgment affirmed.