History
  • No items yet
midpage
661 F.3d 1343
Fed. Cir.
2010

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC., Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., and Virginia Electric and Power Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 2009-5031, 2009-5032

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 27, 2010.

883 F.3d 883

Brad Fagg, David M. Kerr, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Lisa L. Donahue, Harold D. Lester Jr., Andrew P. Averbach, Christopher J. Carney, Scott D. Slater, Department of Justice, Jane K. Taylor, Department of Energy, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves for a 14-day extension of time, until September 7, 2010, within which to file its response to the motion for a remand.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

HITACHI HOME ELECTRONICS (AMERICA), INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Rosa Hernandez, Port Director, United States Customs and Border Protection, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2010-1345.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 27, 2010.

883 F.3d 883

Sidney N. Weiss, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jeanne E. Davidson, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. moves for a 30-day extension of time, until October 7, 2010, to file its opening brief. Hitachi states that the United States, et al., consent.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated.

Case Details

Case Name: Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Aug 27, 2010
Citations: 661 F.3d 1343; 2011 WL 5120387; 391 F. App'x 883; 2010-1345
Docket Number: 2010-1345
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United States, 661 F.3d 1343