History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hirschmann v. Hirschmann
136 N.J. Eq. 230
N.J.
1945
Check Treatment

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, which is reported at 135 N.J. Eq. 23.

Appellant, in her brief, discusses an item concerning household furniture. This item appears not to have been treated in the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor nor disposed of by the decree entered in the court below. However, the point was not incorporated in the petition of appeal as a ground for reversal and, therefore, is not subject to examination by this court. NewJersey B.L. and I. Co. v. Lord, 66 N.J. Eq. 344, 350; Munger v. Munger, 130 N.J. Eq. 279, 286. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None. *Page 232

Case Details

Case Name: Hirschmann v. Hirschmann
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 5, 1945
Citation: 136 N.J. Eq. 230
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.