Hinton v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
109 So. 103
| Ala. | 1926|
Check TreatmentPlea 2 was that of payment, and the testimony offered was pertinent to that issue, if after the due date of the note. Frank v. Thompson,
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
