Hinson v. State

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We find no error in the record. The evidence of what is called antecedent threats was properly excluded on two, grounds:

First, because what is called a threat was no threat • and, second, because no overt act is shown which would have justified its introduction in evidence if it had been a threat.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hinson v. State

Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court

Date Published: Apr 15, 1889

Citation: 66 Miss. 532

Court Abbreviation: Miss.