There was no legal merit in the motion for a continu-, anee; and as, under the facts in evidence, the property levied on was manifestly, and beyond doubt, subject to the plaintiffs’ exe* cution, there was no error in directing a verdict accordingly.
Judgment affirmed,.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
