Hingson v. State

Nov 20, 1991
No. 90-2390
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Barfield
BARFIELD, Judge.

The record supports the trial judge’s findings, on remand from this court ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‍in Hingson v. State, 553 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), that the scoresheet was improperly scored, but that appellant was not influenced by the erroneous score in ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‍entering his plea to twenty years imprisonment. The trial judge- did not err in refusing to allow appellant to withdraw his plea, nor in resentencing ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‍him on remand to twenty years, a departure sentence under the corrected scoresheet, based upon that plea.

The trial judge’s refusal to allow appellant to ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‍withdraw the plea, and the resen-tence, are AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED, however, for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial judge’s ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‍oral pronouncement with respect to credit for time served.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.