History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hingson v. State
589 So. 2d 453
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
BARFIELD, Judge.

The record supports the trial judge’s findings, on remand from this court in Hingson v. State, 553 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), that the scoresheet was improperly scored, but that appellant was not influenced by the erroneous score in entering his plea to twenty years imprisonment. The trial judge- did not err in refusing to allow appellant to withdraw his plea, nor in resentencing him on remand to twenty years, a departure sentence under the corrected scoresheet, based upon that plea.

The trial judge’s refusal to allow appellant to withdraw the plea, and the resen-tence, are AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED, however, for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial judge’s oral pronouncement with respect to credit for time served.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hingson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 20, 1991
Citation: 589 So. 2d 453
Docket Number: No. 90-2390
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.