History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hilo Finance & Thrift Co. v. De Costa
33 Haw. 765
| Haw. | 1936
|
Check Treatment

Defendants in error have interposed a motion to dismiss the writ of error issued out of this court by plaintiff in error on the ground that no brief has been filed by plaintiff in error within fifteen days after the cause was placed on the calendar of this court as required by paragraph 1 of rule 3 of the court rules.

According to the record of the clerk of the supreme court the above cause was placed on the calendar of the court on April 13, 1936. Under the rule of the supreme court above referred to plaintiff in error is entitled to fifteen days after the cause is placed on the calendar within which to file its brief. That period of time having not yet elapsed, the motion to dismiss is premature and therefore must be overruled.

Motion overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Hilo Finance & Thrift Co. v. De Costa
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 14, 1936
Citation: 33 Haw. 765
Docket Number: No. 2273.
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.