History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hillsborough County v. Bennett
173 So. 2d 688
Fla.
1965
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon certified question under Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and on briefs of counsel for the respective parties and it appearing that the question certified does not meet the prerequisites of Rule 4.61, F.A.R. as interpreted in prior decisions of this Court, it is ordered that answer to the certified question be and the same is hereby declined. See: Dade County v. Philbrick, 162 So.2d 266, and special concurring opinion of Justice Hobson in State Road Department v. Forehand, 56 So.2d 901.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hillsborough County v. Bennett
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 7, 1965
Citation: 173 So. 2d 688
Docket Number: No. 34057
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.