37 Wis. 246 | Wis. | 1875
Upon looking into the record, we do not find any bill of exceptions. The cause seems to have been tried by a referee, who reported his findings of fact and conclusions of law, together with the evidence, to the circuit court. Exceptions were filed by the defendant to these findings. The plaintiff made a motion to confirm the report of the referee, which motion was heard, together with the exceptions to the same. The court refused to confirm the report, and ordered that the motion be denied, and that the plaintiff have leave, on payment of costs, to bring in new parties and amend his complaint as he might be advised. From this order an appeal has been taken, and the cause has been argued in this court upon the assumption that the evidence taken before the referee, and his findings thereon, were before us for review. But this is a mistake. In Gilbank v. Stephenson, 30 Wis., 155, it was held that when a cause was tried by a referee, in order to enable this court to review questions of fact and conclusions of law, the circuit court must pass upon such questions, and a bill of exceptions must, be settled as in a cause tried originally in the circuit
The order of the circuit court must consequently be affirmed.
By the Court. — Order affirmed.
