History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hiller v. Crenshaw
243 U.S. 634
SCOTUS
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Company v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.

Case Details

Case Name: Hiller v. Crenshaw
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 30, 1917
Citation: 243 U.S. 634
Docket Number: No. 646
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Hiller v. Crenshaw, 243 U.S. 634