History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. State
52 S.E. 322
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
.Lumpkiu, J.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of guilty; and the presiding judge having refused a new trial, this court will not interfere. The question of whether or not section 122 of the Penal Code was applicable to the class of employees involved in this case was abandoned in the argument.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 10, 1905
Citation: 52 S.E. 322
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.