Hill v. StateHill v. State
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Kurt L. Barch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NIMMONS, Judge.
We grant appellee‘s Motion for Rehearing, vacate our opinion filed February 6, 1986, and affirm the trial court‘s sentence of five years incarceration which the court imposed after revoking the appellant‘s community control in October, 1984, the appellant having earlier received a split sentence in June, 1980, as a youthful offender under
The Florida Supreme Court in Brooks v. State, 478 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 1985), has settled the question of whether the sentencing court, upon revocation of community control under
The Brooks decision has, we believe, been properly interpreted as authorizing,
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, C.J., and ZEHMER, J., concur.
NOTES
Notes
Inasmuch as the appellant was resentenced in 1984, we do not address the amended version of Section 958.14, as amended by Chapter 85-288, Section 24, Laws of Florida, particularly since this appellant was resentenced to not longer than six years.
958.14 Violation of probation or community control program. — A violation or alleged violation of probation or the terms of a community control program shall subject the youthful offender to the provisions of