Hill v. StateHill v. State
PER CURIAM
In 1988, appellant Johnny Hill was found guilty by a jury of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirmed. Hill v. State, 299 Ark. 327, 773 S.W.2d 424 (1989). Appellant subsequently filed in this court a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to
In 1990, appellant filed in the trial court a petition to correct the sentence pursuant to
A claim that a sentence is illegal presents an issue of subject-matter jurisdiction that can
An illegal sentence is one that the trial court lacked the authority to impose. Richie v. State, 2009 Ark. 602, 357 S.W.3d 909. When the sentence imposed is within the maximum prescribed by law, the sentence is not illegal, because the court had the authority to impose it. Id.; Cooley v. State, 322 Ark. 348, 909 S.W.2d 312 (1995). Here, the life sentence imposed on appellant was clearly within the sentencing range for the offense of first-degree murder. See
This court has held that it will reverse the circuit court‘s decision granting or denying postconviction relief only when that decision is clearly erroneous. See Pankau v. State, 2013 Ark. 162; Banks v. State, 2013 Ark. 147. The trial court‘s decision to deny appellant‘s petition was not clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Johnny Lee Hill, pro se appellant.
Dustin McDaniel, Att‘y Gen., by: Ashley Argo Priest, Ass‘t Att‘y Gen., for appellee.