History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Sims
149 Ga. 588
Ga.
1919
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

1. The ground of the motion for new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence was not mentioned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and will be treated as abandoned.

2. The only other errors claimed to have been committed upon the trial related to instructions to the jury, which were set out and error assigned thereon in the motion for new trial. While certain portions of the charge complained of were not entirely accurate, the inaccuracies were not of such character as to be hurtful to the plaintiff, against whom the verdict was rendered.

3. The verdict for the defendant was authorized by the evidence, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Sims
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 11, 1919
Citation: 149 Ga. 588
Docket Number: No. 1339
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.