History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Pennsylvania
532 U.S. 968
SCOTUS
2001
Check Treatment

C. A. 3d Cir.; and

C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 *969(1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Pennsylvania
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 16, 2001
Citation: 532 U.S. 968
Docket Number: No. 00-8421; No. 00-8422
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.