History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Lundy
44 S.E. 830
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Candler, J.

1. It is not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial that the judge of the superior court, on the trial of an appeal from a county court, refused, on motion, to dismiss the appeal, or to dismiss the petition of one of the parties thereto. The error, if any, should he made the subject of a direct exception. Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043, and cases cited.

2. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and it was not erroneous to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Lundy
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 30, 1903
Citation: 44 S.E. 830
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.