| Miss. | Mar 15, 1917
delivered the opinion of the court.
This cause is ruled by Martin v. Martin, 69 Miss. 315" date_filed="1891-10-15" court="Miss." case_name="Martin v. Martin">69 Miss. 315, 13 So. 267, from which it follows that the court below should not have required security of appellant Sam Hill; and, since that fact must determine the present controversy, the decree of the court below is reversed, and the hill dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.