History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Duke
77 S.E. 584
Ga.
1913
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

1. The charge was substantially correct, and adjusted to the evidence. In-so far as proper, the requests to charge were covered by the general charge.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict) and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Duke
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 26, 1913
Citation: 77 S.E. 584
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.