Hill v. Duke

139 Ga. 508 | Ga. | 1913

Atkinson, J.

1. The charge was substantially correct, and adjusted to the evidence. In-so far as proper, the requests to charge were covered by the general charge.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict) and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.