History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall
293 Conn. 913
Conn.
2009
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 89 (AC 29572), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court properly supplied purported missing terms to a restrictive covenant in the subject employment agreement without resorting to the equitable remedy of reformation?”

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Sheila A. Huddleston, Glenn M. Cunningham and Lee A. Duval, in opposition. Decided September 9, 2009

Case Details

Case Name: Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Sep 9, 2009
Citation: 293 Conn. 913
Docket Number: SC 18444
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.