History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hilaire v. State
778 So. 2d 479
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla.1987); Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (stating that “the legislature did not intend to require a finding that an operable handgun be involved in order to sustain a conviction of robbery with a firearm”), modified on other grounds, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla.1984).

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hilaire v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 21, 2001
Citation: 778 So. 2d 479
Docket Number: No. 4D99-4067
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.