Hilaire v. State
778 So. 2d 479 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2001
Affirmed. See Bentley v. State, 501 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla.1987); Watson v. State, 437 So.2d 702, 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (stating that “the legislature did not intend to require a finding that an operable handgun be involved in order to sustain a conviction of robbery with a firearm”), modified on other grounds, 453 So.2d 810 (Fla.1984).