History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan
165 F.2d 789
5th Cir.
1948
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

It will serve no useful purpose for us to consider and discuss the questions so fully and interestedly presented in appellant’s brief. We regard them as not open to us but as foreclosed by the decisions in Economy Light & Power Co. v. United States, 256 U.S. 113, 41 S.Ct. 409, 65 L.Ed. 847, and Escanaba & Lake Michigan Transp. Co. v. City of Chicago, 107 U.S. 678, 2 S.Ct. 185, 27 L.Ed. 442, and the other cases it cites.

On the authority of those cases, the judgment appealed from, 70 F.Supp. 628, is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Higman Towing Co. v. Cocrehan
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 6, 1948
Citation: 165 F.2d 789
Docket Number: No. 12003
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.