History
  • No items yet
midpage
Highsmith v. State
508 So. 2d 1289
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Highsmith v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 11, 1987
Citation: 508 So. 2d 1289
Docket Number: No. BN-495
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.