History
  • No items yet
midpage
Highsmith v. Moffitt
24 Ga. App. 690
Ga. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The petition as amended set out a cause of action and was not subject to any ground of demurrer interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. The defendant demurred to the petition generally and specially, the demurrer was overruled, and he excepted. Seabroolc & Kennedy, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 113 Ga. 80; 137 Ga. 704; 106 Ga. 568; 21 Ga. App. 602; 7 Ga. App. 584; *69378 Ga. 260; 92 Ga. 495; 134 Ga. 713; 1 Labatt, M. &. S. 394 and cit.

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, D. 8. Atkinson, contra,

cited: Civil Code (1910), § 3130; 88 Ga. 286 (2); 9 Ga. App. 738 (2); Shearman & Redf. Neg. (6th ed.) 621, 637, §§ 217, 219a; Labatt, M. & S. (2d ed.), §§ 1321-2, 1329-31; 129 Ga. 688; 127 Ga. 404; 98 Ga. 655; 5 Ga. App. 223 (2); 13 Ga. App. 799, 817; 1 Ga. App. 403. Distinguished: 92 Ga. 495; 134 Ga. 713.

Case Details

Case Name: Highsmith v. Moffitt
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 27, 1920
Citation: 24 Ga. App. 690
Docket Number: 10957
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.