History
  • No items yet
midpage
High v. The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc.
3:11-cv-05478
N.D. Cal.
Apr 10, 2012
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 3:11-cv-05478-EMC Document 49 Filed 04/10/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JACKIE L. HIGH, No. C-11-5478 EMC Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MEPCO FINANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS v.

THE CHOICE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al. , (Docket No. 32) Defendants. ___________________________________/

Defendant Mepco Finance Corporation motion for dismissal of Plaintiff Jackie L. High’s complaint for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before the Court on April 6, 2012. Docket No. 32. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. First, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to identify a contractual relationship between Defendant Mepco and Plaintiff or a contractual obligation owed to Plaintiff that Defendant Mepco breached. 1 Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing as to Defendant Mepco.

Second, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to plead claims under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 and § 17500, as Plaintiff has not yet alleged that Defendant Mepco had knowledge of a material fact that it concealed from Plaintiff. At most, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Mepco knew that U.S. Fidelis was bankrupt, but does not explain why this fact was 1 The Court declines to take judicial notice of either contract submitted by the parties, as the parties dispute the authenticity of the documents.

Case 3:11-cv-05478-EMC Document 49 Filed 04/10/12 Page 2 of 2 material. Compl. ¶ 24. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s claims for false advertising and unfair competition as to Defendant Mepco.

The Court GRANTS Defendant Mepco’s motion to dismiss the claims against Defendant Mepco. Plaintiff is given leave to amend her complaint accordingly. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order.

This order disposes of Docket No. 32.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 10, 2012 _________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 2

Case Details

Case Name: High v. The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Apr 10, 2012
Docket Number: 3:11-cv-05478
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.