History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higgins v. State
45 Ga. App. 223
Ga. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary, and excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The only two special grounds of the motion complain of the court’s charge on alibi and confessions. The defendant introduced no evidence, and his statement authorized the charge on the subject of alibi. The sworn testimony authorized the charge on confessions. The charge on each subject was adapted to the *224facts and in compliance with the law. The evidence authorized the verdict, no error of law is shown, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 30, 1932. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Jenkins, P. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Higgins v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 30, 1932
Citation: 45 Ga. App. 223
Docket Number: 22129
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.