History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higgins v. State
137 S.E. 788
Ga. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

1. The instructions to the jury covered every issue in the case, and, as far as legal and applicable to the facts, the requests to charge were covered by the charge as given.

2. When considered in the light of the entire charge, the excerpts therefrom of which complaint is made show no reversible error.

3. While the evidence of an accomplice must be corroborated, the extent of the corroboration is entirely for the jury. There being some corroborating testimony this court will not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict.

Judgment affvrmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Higgins v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 12, 1927
Citation: 137 S.E. 788
Docket Number: 17968
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.