History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higgins v. Schneider
164 A.2d 299
N.J.
1960
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.

Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.

For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: Higgins v. Schneider
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 10, 1960
Citation: 164 A.2d 299
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.