History
  • No items yet
midpage
991 A.2d 305
Pa.
2010

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2010, it appearing that the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County erred in granting Respondents’ preliminary objections as to Petitioner’s intentional tort claims on the basis that Petitioner had failed adequately to allege willful misconduct, and it further appearing that the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming that determination, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 14, 2008 is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County to reinstate Petitioner’s intentional tort claims.

Case Details

Case Name: Higby Development, LLC v. Sartor
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 23, 2010
Citations: 991 A.2d 305; 605 Pa. 456; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 526; Appeal, No. 540 MAL 2008
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 540 MAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Higby Development, LLC v. Sartor, 991 A.2d 305