History
  • No items yet
midpage
Higbie v. Edgarton
3 Paige Ch. 253
New York Court of Chancery
1831
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

said the defendant should have appeared and opposed "the former application, if he had any reasons to show why the order then asked for should not be made. That if the order was improper, or had been obtained against him through any inadvertence or mistake, his proper course was to apply to open the motion, or to vacate the order.' The attachment was therefore granted; but with liberty to the defendant to apply, at the next motion day, to vacate the former order.

Case Details

Case Name: Higbie v. Edgarton
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Apr 19, 1831
Citation: 3 Paige Ch. 253
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.