119 Ky. 612 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1905
Opinion by
Affirming.
The sole question presented for our consideration by the record in this case is; Can an infant party to an action brought to obtain a decree for the sale of real estate, of
The authorities relied on by counsel for appellant do not conflict with the views herein expressed. While they illustrate the zeal of this court in protecting the rights of infants, it will be found that they are cases in which the lower court was without jurisdiction to act upon the infant’s rights, or there was an attempt either by the infant himself or some one assuming to act for him to illegally bind his. estate or waive his property or other rights in a manner forbidden by law.
It follows from the foregoing conclusions that the chancellor did not err in overruling the purchaser’s: exceptions to the report of sale, or in confirming the sale.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.