History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hicks v. Walker
30 S.E. 383
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
Lewis, J.

Where two-actions in favor of the same plaintiff, but against different defendants, were consolidated in the court below and referred to an auditor, who' reported thereon, making separate findings against each defendant; and where the defendants joined in filing exceptions to the auditor’s report, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain a bill of exceptions, in which both the defendants unite, complaining of error in the judgment of the court disallowing their exceptions to the auditor’s report. Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746.

Writ of' error dismissed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Hicks v. Walker
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 1, 1898
Citation: 30 S.E. 383
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.