History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hicks v. State
362 So. 2d 173
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1978
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

An appeal from a denial of appellant’s motion to vacate a portion of a sentence under F.R.Cr.P. 3.850. Appellant urges that the trial court erred in giving him a “split sentence” — three years imprisonment followed by seven years probation — on his nolo contendere plea to a charge of attempted second degree murder. While this argument may have previously had merit under Robinson v. State, 256 So.2d 390 (Fla.3d DCA 1973) and its progeny, it is now clear that a trial court may in its discretion sentence a defendant to a period of incarceration followed by a period of probation. See Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1977); State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976), and State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hicks v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 15, 1978
Citation: 362 So. 2d 173
Docket Number: No. JJ-414
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.