History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hicks v. Rosenbaum
156 N.Y.S. 967
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1916
|
Check Treatment
Per'Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by confining the examination to the issues raised by the denials in the answer, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order affirmed as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Hicks v. Rosenbaum
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1916
Citation: 156 N.Y.S. 967
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.