History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hicks v. Green
9 Cal. 74
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The findings of the Court, which are supported by the evidence, fully establish the plaintiff’s right to recover. The defence sought to be established by the appellant was in the nature of a counterclaim, and should have been specially pleaded. The evidence offered was not admissible under the general issue.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hicks v. Green
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 9 Cal. 74
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.