midpage

Hicks v. BurhansHicks v. Burhans

New York Supreme Court
May 15, 1813
Reporters:
Per Curiam.

The written promise to pay, if founded oh -it *246past consideration, may be good, if the past service ‍​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‍be laid to have been done on request; and if not so laid, a request may be implied from the beneficial nature of the consideration, and the circumstances of the transaction. (1 Caines’ ‍​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‍Rep. 585, 586.) Here the past service consisted in an expensive pursuit, by the plaintiffs, of certain fugitive debtors, who were indebted to the defendant an others ; and it appeared that the ‍​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‍plaintiffs had exhibited their accounts, at a meeting of the creditors, and that the-defendant examined them, and made no objection, except to a single item of the charges. A request, in this case, might ‍​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‍have been implied; and we ought to intend it to have been proved upon the trial. There are no formal pleadings in the case, and the return does not negative the fact ‍​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‍of a request.

There was no other objection raised that merits notice. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hicks v. Burhans
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1813
Citation: 10 Johns. 243
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In