History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hickman v. Haines
10 Ill. 20
Ill.
1848
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The case of Ripley v. Morris, 2 Gilm. 381, is decisive of the motion. The Court there held that a writ' of error was a new action, and that whenever a non-resident commences an action either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs, the Court is required to dismiss the same.

The case is dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff in error.

Motion allowed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hickman v. Haines
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1848
Citation: 10 Ill. 20
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.