Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
34 Mont. 106 | Mont. | 1906
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment, and from an order of the district court denying them a new trial.
Appellants’ brief does not contain any specification of errors relied upon, as required by Rule X of the Rules of this court (30 Mont, xxxviii, 82 Pac. ix). Upon the authority of the following eases the judgment and order are affirmed: (Cole v. Ryan, 24 Mont. 122, 60 Pac. 991; Rehberg v. Greiser, 24 Mont. 487, 62 Pac. 820; Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516, 71 Pac. 755; Larkin v. Butte & Boston C. M. Co., 28 Mont. 41, 72 Pac. 304.
Affirmed.