History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
34 Mont. 106
Mont.
1906
Check Treatment
MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment, and from an order of the district court denying them a new trial.

Appellants’ brief does not contain any specification of errors relied upon, as required by Rule X of the Rules of this court (30 Mont, xxxviii, 82 Pac. ix). Upon the authority of the following eases the judgment and order are affirmed: (Cole v. Ryan, 24 Mont. 122, 60 Pac. 991; Rehberg v. Greiser, 24 Mont. 487, 62 Pac. 820; Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516, 71 Pac. 755; Larkin v. Butte & Boston C. M. Co., 28 Mont. 41, 72 Pac. 304.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly concurs. Mr. Justice Milburn, not having heard the argument, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 9, 1906
Citation: 34 Mont. 106
Docket Number: No. 2,253
Court Abbreviation: Mont.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.