History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission
616 So. 2d 194
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1993
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Hibbott’s application for mandamus was properly denied because he did not show a clear legal right to the advanceable control release date he sought, or that the Florida Parole Commission had a clear legal duty to grant it. See King v. Florida Parole Commission, 614 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON and MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 13, 1993
Citation: 616 So. 2d 194
Docket Number: No. 92-1710
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.