Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission, 616 So. 2d 194

PER CURIAM.

Hibbott’s application for mandamus was properly denied because he did not show a clear legal right to the advanceable control release date he sought, or that the Florida Parole Commission had a clear legal duty to grant it. See King v. Florida Parole Commission, 614 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON and MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Apr 13, 1993

Citations: 616 So. 2d 194; 1993 WL 107054; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510; No. 92-1710

Docket Number: No. 92-1710

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.