midpage

Hiatt v. GobltHiatt v. Goblt

Indiana Supreme Court
May 15, 1862
Reporters:
Per Curiam.

In this suit, to foreclose a mortgage, copies of the mortgage ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍and notes were not made parts of the complaint, and thus identified, either by being copied into the complaint, or by ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍reference in the complaint to copies or originals filed with it, although a mortgage and notes were filed’ with the complaint. Nor ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍was a copy of either one of them filed, or referred to in the complaint. The complaint was bad.

M. L. Bundy, ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍Smith § Smith, and Thos. A. Hendricks, for the appellants. J. H. Mellett, and Martindale &¡ Grubbs, for the appellees.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for a ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‍new trial, with leave to amend. See 2 G. & H. p. 375.

Case Details

Case Name: Hiatt v. Goblt
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1862
Citation: 18 Ind. 494
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
Log In