History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hiatt v. Goblt
18 Ind. 494
Ind.
1862
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this suit, to foreclose a mortgage, copies of the mortgage and notes were not made parts of the complaint, and thus identified, either by being copied into the complaint, or by reference in the complaint to copies or originals filed with it, although a mortgage and notes were filed' with the complaint. Nor was a copy of either one of them filed, or referred to in the complaint. The complaint was bad.

M. L. Bundy, Smith § Smith, and Thos. A. Hendricks, for the appellants. J. H. Mellett, and Martindale &¡ Grubbs, for the appellees.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial, with leave to amend. See 2 G. & H. p. 375.

Case Details

Case Name: Hiatt v. Goblt
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1862
Citation: 18 Ind. 494
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.