midpage

Heyer v. SullivanHeyer v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 14, 1918
Versions:103 A. 1052
88 N.J. Eq. 595
3 Stock. 595
1918 N.J. LEXIS 316
Per Curiam.

We agree with the vice-chancellor that the gift was not established. We express no opinion on the other points discussed by him. Let the decree be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12. For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Heyer v. Sullivan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 14, 1918
Citations: 103 A. 1052; 88 N.J. Eq. 595; 3 Stock. 595; 1918 N.J. LEXIS 316
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In