History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heyer v. Sullivan
88 N.J. Eq. 595
N.J.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We agree with the vice-chancellor that the gift was not established. We express no opinion on the other points discussed by him. Let the decree be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12. For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Heyer v. Sullivan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 14, 1918
Citation: 88 N.J. Eq. 595
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.