History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hewlett v. Piedmont Portland Cement Co.
147 Ga. 136
Ga.
1917
Check Treatment
Hill, J.

While some of the evidence in this case was of doubtful admissibility, yet, under the pleadings and the evidence which was unexcepted to, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying and disallowing the attorney’s fees sought to be recovered by the intervenors, and a new trial is not required. • See Coffee v. Dunagan, 141 Ga. 564 (81 S. E. 880).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hewlett v. Piedmont Portland Cement Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1917
Citation: 147 Ga. 136
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In