History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hewitt v. Lansdale
26 Wash. 615
Wash.
1901
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

A motion to dismiss the appeal was taken with the record. The objection by respondents is that the appeal bond is defective. The judgment of the superior court was against the appellants, and for dismissal of the action, with costs taxed in the sum of $53. The appeal bond is in the sum of $200, and is conditioned that appellants “shall pay all costs and damages that may he awarded against them on such appeal or dismissal thereof, not exceeding the sum of $200.” But the bond here goes further and contains the following conditions; “And shall perform and satisfy any judgment which said court may make or order to he made or rendered by the superior court in case said judgment is affirmed.” Evidently there are con*616ditions for both, an appeal and stay bond, and under the uniform construction of such bonds by this court it is insufficient ,to maintain the appeal.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hewitt v. Lansdale
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 16, 1901
Citation: 26 Wash. 615
Docket Number: No. 3755
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.