32:T477,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524","datePublished":"1936-02-13","legislationDate":"1936-02-13","citation":"Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524 (Ala. 1936)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Alabama","description":"Read the full text of Hewett v. State (Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524 (Ala. 1936)). This legal opinion, filed in 1936-02-13, from the Supreme Court of Alabama discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/hewett-v-state--3236390"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/hewett-v-state--3236390","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Hewett v. State, Supreme Court of Alabama, Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524 (Ala. 1936)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T403, GARDNER, Justice.

The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions, from a judgment of conviction for murder in the first degree, with the infliction of life imprisonment as the penalty.

There appears no error in the record proper. Scott v. State, 228 Ala. 509, 154 So. 113.

The record discloses charges given for defendant, and some refused, with no reference to any oral charge of the court. Appellant argues error as to the refused charges. But in the absence of a bill of exceptions, these are matters not here subject to review. Preston v. State, ante, p. 285, 164 So. 571; Levert v. State, 220 Ala. 425, 125 So. 664; Jiles v. State, 218 Ala. 658, 120 So. 147.

Let the judgment stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.