History
  • No items yet
midpage
Heston v. Martin
11 Cal. 41
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field J., conccurring.

This appeal is without merit, and it is apparent that the only point seriously urged by the appellant—to wit: that an account is necessary, giving the items of work and materials in the statement of lien filed— cannot be maintained in case of a contract for a sum in gross.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Heston v. Martin
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 11 Cal. 41
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.