History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hester v. State
357 So. 2d 481
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1978
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Defendant was adjudged guilty after a jury verdict of trespass. On this appeal, he claims error upon the admission of his confession without a specific finding by the court that the confession was voluntarily given. See McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). Error is not presented for the reasons set out in Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974). See also Von Horn v. State, 334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

A second point as to the scope of cross-examination does not present error.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hester v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 18, 1978
Citation: 357 So. 2d 481
Docket Number: No. 77-1113
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.