On thе 28th day of March, 1906, a Democratic primary election for the nomination of candidates for various offices was held in the county of Sebastian, in this State. N. E. Hester was a candidate at that election for the nomination as candidate of the Democratic party for the offiсe of county clerk of that county. According to the returns of the election, he was defeated by his opponent, T. N. Reed, who was afterwards declared the nominee of the Democratic party of Sebastian County ■for county clerk. On the 23d day of June, 1906, Hester filed a complaint in еquity before J. V. Bourland, chancellor of the Sebastian Chancery Court, and thereby sought to contest the election of Reed upon various grounds of fraud and irregularity. The chancellor refused to hear the contest; and Hester filed in this court a petition for mandamus to compel him to do so.
The proceedings before the chancellor were based upon an-act of the General Assembly of this State, entitled “An Act to Providе' for Contests in Primary Elections,” which is as follows:
“Sec. 1. That any defeated candidate at any legalized primary election in this State may contest such an election before the chancellor at chambers, or the chancery court of the chancery district in which such an eleсtion took place, by giving the contestee five days’ notice in writing, which notice shall be served as other process is served, and by filing a complaint in equity setting forth the grounds of such contest in the county where such contest originated. Said contest shall be heard by such chancellor at chаmbers or the chancery court, if it be in session in the county where the contest originated, upon depositions, affidavits, or oral testimony.
“Sec. 2. Thе chancellor at chambers or the chancery court shall have the power to have the ballots, ballot boxes, poll books, and tally sheets used at such an election brought before him and investigated and the ballots recounted, and do all other acts and things necessary to arrive at the true result of such an election.
“Sec. 3. The chancellor at chambers or the chancery court shall hear and determine suсh contest speedily and without delay, to the end that the name of the successful candidate may be certified as required by law and printed on the ballots to be voted at the ensuing ©lection.” Acts 1905, c. 328, p. 782.
The intention of this act is to vest the chancery court with the jurisdiction to hear and determinе contested elections for nominations, with power to the chancellor to hear the same in the vacation of court. The respоndent holds the act to be unconstitutional.
The Constitution provides: “The judicial power of the State shall be vested in one Supreme Court; in circuit сourts; in county and probate courts; and in justices of the peace. The General Assembly may also vest such jurisdiction as may be deemed neсessary in municipal corporation courts, courts of common pleas, where established; and, when deemed expedient, may establish sеparate courts of chancery.” Art. 7, § 1.
It vests the-Supreme Court with appellate jurisdiction and with power to issue writs of quo warranto to the cirсuit judges and chancellors, “and the officers of political corporations when the question involved is the legal' existence of such cоrporation.”
The county court has jurisdiction in “all matters relating to county taxes, roads, bridges, ferries, paupers, bastardy, vagrants, the apprеnticeship of minors, the disbursement of money for county purposes, and in every other case that may be necessary to the internal improvеment and local concerns of the respective counties.”
Probate courts have jurisdiction “in' matters relative to the probate of wills, the estates of deceased persons, executors, administrators, guardians, and persons of unsound mind and their estates.”
Justices of the peаce are vested with jurisdiction, exclusive of the circuit court, “in all matters of contract where the amount in controversy does not excеed the sum of one hundred dollars, excluding interest, and concurrent jurisdiction in matters of contract where the amount in controversy does not exceed the sum of three hundred dollars, excluding interest; and concurrent jurisdiction in suits for the recovery of personal property, where the valuе of the property does not exceed the sum of three hundred dollars, and in all matters of damage to personal property where thе amount in controversy does not exceed the sum of one hundred dollars;” and such jurisdiction of misdemeanors as may be prescribed by law, and to sit as examining courts and commit,, discharge or recognize offenders to the courts having jurisdiction for further trial, and to bind persons to keep the peace or for good behavior; and they are made conservators of the peace in their respective counties.
The Genеral Assembly may invest corporation courts, for towns and cities, with jurisdiction concurrent with justices of the peace in civil and criminal matters, and may invest such of them as it may deem expedient with jurisdiction of any criminal offenses not punishable by death or imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The General Assembly may authorize the judge of the county court of any county to hold a court of common pleas, with such jurisdiction in matters of contract аnd other civil matters, not involving title to real estate, as may be vested in such court.
The circuit court is vested with jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases the exclusive jurisdiction of which may not be vested in some other court provided for by the Constitution; and, until the General Assembly shall deem it expedient to establish courts of chancery, shall have jurisdiction in matters of equity, subject to appeal to the Supreme Court; and with appellate jurisdiction over courts inferior to it. Const. 1874, art. 7, § 15.
The Constitution divides and parcels the judicial power of the State among the courts named. The General Assembly is authorized to create only three classes of courts, corporate, common pleas and chancery courts, and the jurisdiction with which they may be vested is specified. It can vest chancery courts only with jurisdiction in matters of equity. All other jurisdiction is vested in other courts. The Legislaturе is without power to divest or change it. Any law passed for that purpose would be unconstitutional and void.
Election contests for nominations arе not matters of equity, and have never been so considered'; and the act of the Legislature to. vest chancery courts with -jurisdiction as to them is unconstitutional and void.
After providing for the contest of elections for • Governor, Secretary of State, Treasurer, Auditor and Attorney General, thе Constitution provides: “The General Assembly shall provide by law the mode of contesting elections in cases not specially provided for in this Constitutiоn.”. Art. 19, § 24. But this has reference only to elections for office, and not for nominations. The only elections of persons mentioned in the Constitution are elections. for office.
The petition is denied.