Hess v. Kemmerer
65 Pa. Super. 247 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1916
Opinion by
The painstaking analysis of the testimony by the trial judge, and his application of decided cases to the undisputed facts in overruling the defendant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto, make it unnecessary to further review this case, and for the reasons given in his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.
