History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hess v. Kemmerer
65 Pa. Super. 247
Pa. Super. Ct.
1916
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The painstaking analysis of the testimony by the trial judge, and his application of decided cases to the undisputed facts in overruling the defendant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto, make it unnecessary to further review this case, and for the reasons given in his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hess v. Kemmerer
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 18, 1916
Citation: 65 Pa. Super. 247
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 195
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.