History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hesman Tall v. The Partnership Development
16-1532
| 4th Cir. | Oct 20, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Gimovsky, WALKER, MURPHY & NELSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland; Elliott L. Schoen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. The P’ship Dev. Grp. Inc., No. 1:15-cv-03352-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Hesman Tall v. The Partnership Development
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 20, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1532
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.