Frederica Herzfeld, Respondent, v William Herzfeld, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
February 5, 2008
857 N.Y.S.2d 169
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“A matrimonial settlement is a contract subject to principles of contract interpretation . . . [and] a court should interpret the contract in accordance with its plain and ordinary meaning” (Edwards v Poulmentis, 307 AD2d 1051, 1052 [2003]; see Girardin v Girardin, 281 AD2d 457 [2001]). “[W]hen interpreting a contract, the court should arrive at a construction which will give fair meaning to all of the language employed by the parties to reach a practical interpretation of the expressions of the parties so that their reasonable expectations will be realized” (Fetner v Fetner, 293 AD2d 645, 645-646 [2002] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Where such an agree
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Carni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
